MCBRIDE v. BAKER PIC N SAV, LLC
GARY MCBRIDE |
BAKER PIC N SAV, LLC |
3:2019cv03046 |
August 12, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
ROGER VINSON |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 FINAL SCHEDULING ORDER re #9 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. All discovery must be completed by June 12, 2020. The pretrial conference will be scheduled by the Court after ruling on any pending dispositive motions and the trial date will be determined at the pretrial conference. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on 10/3/2019. Discovery due by 6/12/2020. (MB) |
Filing 9 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (CONNORS, CLAYTON) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON notified that action is needed Re: #9 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (MB) |
Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement/Certificate of Interested Persons by BAKER PIC N SAV, LLC. (BOROWSKI, TADEUSZ) |
Filing 7 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: Each non-governmental corporate party must file a statement that identifies any parent corporation and any publicly held corporation that owns 10% or more of its stock or states that there is no such corporation. The deadline for filing the statement is set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, and, if not filed sooner, the statement must in any event be filed within 14 days of the date of the scheduling order. The deadline expired on 9/17/2019. A corporate disclosure statement must be filed no later than 9/23/2019. Clerk to notify chambers on 9/23/2019 ). (MB) |
Filing 6 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set for 9/17/2019. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/17/2019. Discovery due by 1/27/2020. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on 9/3/2019. (MB) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON notified that action is needed Re: #5 Answer to Complaint (please see proposed ISO). (MB) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by BAKER PIC N SAV, LLC. (BOROWSKI, TADEUSZ) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by GARY MCBRIDE. BAKER PIC N SAV, LLC served on 8/15/2019, answer due 9/5/2019. (WESTBERRY, RICHARD) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to BAKER PIC N SAV, LLC. (MB) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR SUMMONS by GARY MCBRIDE (CONNORS, CLAYTON) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BAKER PIC N SAV, LLC ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AFLNDC-4586314.), filed by GARY MCBRIDE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (CONNORS, CLAYTON) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: MCBRIDE v. BAKER PIC N SAV, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: BAKER PIC N SAV, LLC | |
Represented By: | TADEUSZ AUGUSTA BOROWSKI |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: GARY MCBRIDE | |
Represented By: | CLAYTON MORRIS CONNORS |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.