BUCHANAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
CLINT BUCHANAN |
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO LLC and 3M COMPANY |
3:2019cv03174 |
August 19, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
HOPE T CANNON |
GARY R JONES |
M CASEY RODGERS |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by CLINT BUCHANAN. AEARO HOLDING LLC served on 8/26/2019, answer due 9/16/2019. (REICH, DENNIS) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by CLINT BUCHANAN. 3M COMPANY served on 8/26/2019, answer due 9/16/2019. (REICH, DENNIS) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, #1 Aearo Holdings, LLC, Aearo Intermediate, LLC, Aearo LLC and Aearo Technologies, LLC. (djb) |
MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES added. MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON no longer assigned to case. (djb) |
Filing 3 NOTICE As to Filing Proposed Summons to Aearo Technologies LLC et al. by CLINT BUCHANAN (REICH, DENNIS) |
Filing 2 NOTICE As to Filing Proposed Summons to 3M Company, et al. by CLINT BUCHANAN (REICH, DENNIS) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AFLNDC-4593267.), filed by CLINT BUCHANAN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (REICH, DENNIS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.