WENK v. DICE et al
Plaintiff: MICHAEL C WENK
Defendant: HOOPER, D LOCKE and D DICE
Case Number: 3:2019cv03371
Filed: September 3, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY
Referring Judge: ROGER VINSON
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 10, 2019 Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT re #5 Order Adopting Report and Recommendation( 90 Day Deadline set for destruction of working file 1/8/2020), Set/Clear Flags (alb)
October 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER ADOPTING #4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. This case is DISMISSED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g), without prejudice to Plaintiffs initiating a new cause of action accompanied by payment of the $400.00 filing fee in its entirety. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on 10/10/2019. (alb)
October 9, 2019 ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON notified that action is needed Re: #4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. (No objections filed.) (alb)
September 10, 2019 Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that Plaintiff's #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis be DENIED and that this case be DISMISSED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g), without prejudice to Plaintiffs initiating a new cause of action accompanied by payment of the $400.00 filing fee in its entirety. RE #1 Complaint - R&R flag set Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 9/10/2019. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 10/8/2019. (alb)
September 4, 2019 Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se Litigant. (alb)
September 4, 2019 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #1 Complaint. Referred to ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY. (alb)
September 3, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by MICHAEL C WENK. (alb)
September 3, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against D DICE, HOOPER, D LOCKE, filed by MICHAEL C WENK. (Attachments: #1 Supplement) (alb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WENK v. DICE et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HOOPER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D LOCKE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D DICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MICHAEL C WENK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?