GAGE v. INCH et al
| BRIAN MARKEITH GAGE |
| T STEPHENS, JOHN DOE, TREVOR PAYNE, MARK S INCH and WALTER CLEMMONS |
| 3:2019cv03650 |
| October 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| HOPE T CANNON |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 41 , is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. Defendant Clemmons' Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 30 , as adopted by Defendant Stephens, ECF No. 35 , is GRANTED, for failure to exhaust. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Sergeant Stephens. Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, ECF No. 9 , is DISMISSED as there are no claims which remain pending against any defendant. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 11/13/2020. (alb)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 39 , is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. Defendant Clemmons' Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 30 , is GRANTED, and the First Amended Complaint, ECF No. 9 , is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to Defendant Clemmons. The Clerk is directed to refer the matter back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 10/09/2020. (alb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
