CATCHINGS v. 3M COMPANY
| WILLIE CATCHINGS |
| 3M COMPANY, AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and AEARO LLC |
| 3:2019cv03798 |
| October 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| GARY R JONES |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC. (djb) |
| Filing 3 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants All Defendants., filed by WILLIE CATCHINGS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 SUMMONS TO 3M COMPANY, #3 SUMMONS TO 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, #4 SUMMONS TO AEARO HOLDING LLC, #5 SUMMONS TO AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, #6 SUMMONS TO AEARO LLC, #7 SUMMONS TO AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC) (PANTAZIS, DENNIS) |
| Filing 2 Civil Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number FLN3-13350. Fee status updated to paid. (djb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 3M COMPANY (Filing fee $400.), filed by WILLIE CATCHINGS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (PANTAZIS, DENNIS) |
| MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES added. MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON no longer assigned to case. (djb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
