LOWE v. INCH
| TIMOTHY LOWE |
| MARK INCH |
| 3:2020cv05060 |
| March 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| LACEY A COLLIER |
| MICHAEL J FRANK |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The Clerk of Court shall furnish a copy of the petition, supporting memorandum, and this order to Respondent and the Attorney General of the State of Florida. Within NINETY (90) DAYS (8/3/2020) from the docketing date of this order, Respondent shall file an answer as directed by this order. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 5/5/2020. (jcw)(cc: Attorney General; Respondent)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: 6 Filing Fee Received. (jcw) |
| Filing 6 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number FLN4-39012. Fee status updated to paid. (jcw) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER denying #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Within THIRTY (30) DAYS (5/14/2020) from the date of this order, Petitioner shall submit payment in the amount of $5.00 to the clerk of this court. The check should be made payable to "Clerk, U.S. District Court." Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 4/14/2020. (jcw)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to MICHAEL J FRANK. (jcw) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by TIMOTHY LOWE. (jcw) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The clerk of the court shall forward to Petitioner a form application to proceed in forma pauperis. This case number shall be written on the form. Within THIRTY (30) DAYS (4/23/2020) from the date of this order, Petitioner shall submit payment in the amount of $5.00, or file a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 3/24/2020. (jcw)(Form sent as ordered.)
|
| Filing 2 MEMORANDUM in Support of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by TIMOTHY LOWE. (jcw) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by TIMOTHY LOWE. (Filing fee was not paid. 2 service copies received.) (jcw) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #2 Memorandum in Support, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (jcw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: LOWE v. INCH | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: TIMOTHY LOWE | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MARK INCH | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
