LEE v. MCCRAINE
Plaintiff: ROBERT SINCLAIR LEE
Defendant: T MCCRAINE, C CATTNACH, D DICE, JOHN DOE, RICHBURG, C JONES, MARK S INCH, SGT BOATWRIGHT, TONA, WALKER CLEMMONS, JOUST and JOHN 2 DOE
Case Number: 3:2020cv05462
Filed: May 15, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: HOPE T CANNON
Referring Judge: M CASEY RODGERS
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER DENYING AS MOOT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME, GRANTING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS, AND REQUIRING SERVICE COPIES FROM PLAINTIFF. Plaintiff's motion for extension of time (ECF Doc. #5 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Doc. #7 ) is GRANTED to the extent this case may proceed without prepayment of the entire filing fee. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1), Plaintiff shall pay, within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order, an initial partial filing fee of $10.16. The clerk shall mail a copy of this order with the appropriate cover letter to: Department of Corrections. Within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order, Plaintiff shall provide either (1) nine identical copies of the amended complaint or (2) the funds for the clerk to make these copies for Plaintiff. The clerk is directed to terminate Mark S. Inch, Warden Walker Clemmons and Registered Nurse Joust as defendants in this case, as they are not named in the First Amended Complaint. (Initial Partial Filing Fee due by 7/13/2020.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 6/29/2020. (mb)
June 24, 2020 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #6 Amended Complaint. Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (alb)
June 23, 2020 Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by ROBERT SINCLAIR LEE. (alb)
June 23, 2020 Filing 6 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against BOATWRIGHT, C CATTNACH, D DICE, JOHN 2 DOE, JOHN DOE, C JONES, T MCCRAINE, RICHBURG, TONA, filed by ROBERT SINCLAIR LEE. (No service copies.) (alb)
June 23, 2020 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #5 MOTION to Extend Time. Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (alb)
June 22, 2020 Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time, by ROBERT SINCLAIR LEE. (alb)
June 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER. The #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a complete application. The clerk shall send Plaintiff a complete set of forms needed to file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (for prisoners) and a civil rights complaint form for use by state prisoners in actions under 42 U.S.C. 1983. Within twenty-one days from the date of this order, Plaintiff shall file a complete motion to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $400.00 filing fee and file either a notice of voluntary dismissal or an amended complaint stating a cause of action against each of the named Defendants. (Order and forms mailed.)( Fee due by 6/23/2020.). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 6/2/2020. (alb)
May 18, 2020 Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se Litigant (alb)
May 18, 2020 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint, #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (alb)
May 15, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by ROBERT SINCLAIR LEE. (alb)
May 15, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BOATWRIGHT, C CATTNACH, WALKER CLEMMONS, D DICE, JOHN 2 DOE, JOHN DOE, MARK S INCH, C JONES, JOUST, T MCCRAINE, RICHBURG, TONA, filed by ROBERT SINCLAIR LEE. (No service copies.) (alb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LEE v. MCCRAINE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T MCCRAINE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C CATTNACH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D DICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RICHBURG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C JONES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MARK S INCH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SGT BOATWRIGHT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TONA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WALKER CLEMMONS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOUST
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN 2 DOE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ROBERT SINCLAIR LEE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?