TAYLOR v. ASHLEY
| DANIEL RYAN TAYLOR |
| LARRY ASHLEY, GRAHAM FOUNTAIN, CORIZON HEALTH CARE, CORRECTIONAL STAFF, MCDANIELS, NICHOLAS DELGATO and ERIC ESMOND |
| 3:2020cv05636 |
| July 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| HOPE T CANNON |
| LACEY A COLLIER |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 CLERK'S JUDGMENT re #7 Order. 90 Day Deadline set for destruction of working file 1/20/2021. (alb) |
Filing 7
ORDER. The magistrate Judges #6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 10/22/2020. (alb)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER notified that action is needed Re: #6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. (no objections filed) (sdw) |
|
Filing 6
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Recommended that Plaintiff's Motion Seeking Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (ECF Doc. #4 at 13) be DENIED. This action be DISMISSED under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. The clerk be directed to close the file. R&R flag set. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 09/22/2020. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 10/20/2020. (sdw)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #3 Order. (no amended complaint filed) (sdw) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #5 NOTICE or Amended COMPLAINT (page 1 to be supplemented), re #1 Complaint. (mb) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE or Amended COMPLAINT (page 1 to be supplemented), re #1 Complaint, by DANIEL RYAN TAYLOR. (mb) |
| Filing 4 Petitioner MOTION Seeking Temporary Restraining Order And Preliminary Injunction, by DANIEL RYAN TAYLOR. (mb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #4 Petitioner MOTION Seeking Temporary Restraining Order And Preliminary Injunction. Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (mb) |
| Set Deadlines re #3 ORDER. (Amended Complaint or Notice of Voluntary Dismissal due by 9/12/2020). (mb) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER. The clerk shall send to Plaintiff a civil rights complaint form for use by state prisoners in actions under 42 U.S.C. 1983. Within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, Plaintiff shall file either an amended complaint stating a cause of action against the named Defendants or a notice of voluntary dismissal. (Form mailed w/ORDER). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 8/12/2020. (mb)
|
| Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se Litigant, DANIEL RYAN TAYLOR. (mb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint. (No service copies/filing fee paid). (mb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against LARRY ASHLEY, CORIZON HEALTH CARE, CORRECTIONAL STAFF, NICHOLAS DELGATO, ERIC ESMOND, GRAHAM FOUNTAIN, MCDANIELS (Filing fee paid $400.), filed by DANIEL RYAN TAYLOR. (No service copies). (mb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
