HAFT v. AKC3 et al
| Zoe Rose Haft |
| AKC3 AKC3 d/b/a Stay the Spa, Jennifer Walden-Smith, Cameron Smith and AKC3 |
| 3:2020cv05815 |
| September 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. § 206 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: Re #14 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. Based on the parties' stipulation. No order or action is required. (alb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #14 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. (alb) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by ZOE ROSE HAFT (RUSHING, ROBERT) |
| Filing 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement/Certificate of Interested Persons by AKC3. (ADAMS, RUPERT) |
Filing 12
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set for 10/28/2020. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 11/27/2020. Discovery due by 4/14/2021. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 10/14/2020. (mb)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting as requested #9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time for Defendants To Respond to Plaintiff's #1 Complaint (to November 6, 2021). (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 11/6/2020).) Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 10/14/2020. (mb)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by ERICK M DRLICKA on behalf of All Defendants (DRLICKA, ERICK) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint Unopposed Motion by AKC3, CAMERON SMITH, JENNIFER WALDEN-SMITH. (ADAMS, RUPERT) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by RUPERT BRADLEY ADAMS on behalf of All Defendants (ADAMS, RUPERT) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint Unopposed Motion (mb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #10 Notice of Appearance, #8 Notice of Appearance (please see proposed ISO). (mb) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to AKC3, CAMERON SMITH, JENNIFER WALDEN-SMITH. (Attachments: #1 CAMERON SMITH, #2 JENNIFER WALDEN-SMITH) (mb) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE Request for Summons Jennifer Walden Smith by Zoe Rose Haft re #1 Complaint (MOROCK, TRAVIS) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE Request for Summons for Cameron Smith by Zoe Rose Haft (MOROCK, TRAVIS) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE Request for Summons for AKC 3 LLC by Zoe Rose Haft re #1 Complaint (MOROCK, TRAVIS) |
| Filing 3 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: The parties in the above-referenced case were added to the docket incorrectly and will be corrected by the clerk. Party names are to be entered in all caps and without punctuation. For future reference: Please review the procedure for adding/creating new parties in the "Style Guide for Electronic Case Filing" and/or chapter 10 of the "CM/ECF Attorney User's Guide," available at www.flnd.uscourts.gov. (mb) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by TRAVIS MICHAEL MOROCK on behalf of Zoe Rose Haft (MOROCK, TRAVIS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AFLNDC-5645378.), filed by Zoe Rose Haft. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (RUSHING, ROBERT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
