JACKSON v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff: DOUGLAS MARSHALL JACKSON
Defendant: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Case Number: 3:2020cv05882
Filed: October 16, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: HOPE T CANNON
Referring Judge: LACEY A COLLIER
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 9, 2020 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #10 Emergency MOTION for Injunction. Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (mb)
December 8, 2020 Filing 10 Emergency MOTION for Injunction, by DOUGLAS MARSHALL JACKSON. (mb)
December 6, 2020 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: Set Deadlines #5 ORDER. (Filing fee not received). (mb)
November 24, 2020 Filing 9 MOTION to Extend Time (titled, "Second Petition For Enlargement Of Time, Etc."), by DOUGLAS MARSHALL JACKSON. (mb)
November 24, 2020 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #9 MOTION to Extend Time (titled, "Second Petition For Enlargement Of Time, Etc.") Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (mb)
November 13, 2020 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #8 MOTION For Protection, (titled, "The Church Tribal Community Emergency Imminent Danger Covid-19 Petition For Protection And Safety Measures"). Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (mb)
November 12, 2020 Filing 8 MOTION For Protection, (titled, "The Church Tribal Community Emergency Imminent Danger Covid-19 Petition For Protection And Safety Measures") by DOUGLAS MARSHALL JACKSON. (mb)
November 5, 2020 Filing 7 Emergency Supplement re MOTION For "The Church Religious Liberty Title 42 USC Section 2000cc Rluipa Petition" re #6 MOTION For "The Church Religious Liberty Title 42 USC Section 2000cc Rluipa Petition" by DOUGLAS MARSHALL JACKSON. (mb)
November 5, 2020 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #7 Emergency Supplement re MOTION For "The Church Religious Liberty Title 42 USC Section 2000cc Rluipa Petition" re 6 MOTION For "The Church Religious Liberty Title 42 USC Section 2000cc Rluipa Petition". Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (mb)
November 3, 2020 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #6 MOTION For "The Church Religious Liberty Title 42 USC Section 2000cc Rluipa Petition". Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (mb)
November 2, 2020 Set Deadlines #5 ORDER. (Filing Fee due by 11/24/2020). (mb)
November 2, 2020 Filing 6 MOTION For "The Church Religious Liberty Title 42 USC Section 2000cc Rluipa Petition", by DOUGLAS MARSHALL JACKSON. (mb)
November 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER. Plaintiff's motion titled "Enlargement of Time to Pay $400.00 Filing Fee" (ECF Doc. #4 ) is GRANTED, but only to the extent that Plaintiff is given until November 24, 2020, to file a completed motion to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $400.00 filing fee. As a matter of courtesy only, the clerk is directed to provide a copy of Plaintiff's motion and this order to the warden of Century Correctional Institution. (Copy of motion and order sent to CCI Warden as instructed). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 11/2/2020. (mb)
October 29, 2020 Filing 4 MOTION to Extend Time by DOUGLAS MARSHALL JACKSON. (mb)
October 29, 2020 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #4 MOTION to Extend Time. Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (mb)
October 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER. The clerk shall send Plaintiff a complete set of forms needed to file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (for prisoners). Within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this order, Plaintiff shall file a completed motion to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $400.00 filing fee. (IFP Motion or Filing Fee due by 11/10/2020.) (Form mailed w/ORDER). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 10/20/2020. (mb)
October 16, 2020 Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se Litigant, DOUGLAS MARSHALL JACKSON. (mb)
October 16, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, filed by DOUGLAS MARSHALL JACKSON. (No service copies/no IFP Motion/fee not paid). (mb)
October 16, 2020 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint. (No service copies/no IFP Motion/fee not paid). (mb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: JACKSON v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DOUGLAS MARSHALL JACKSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?