HARRIS v. INCH
WILLIE GEORGE HARRIS |
MARK INCH |
3:2020cv05890 |
October 19, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
MICHAEL J FRANK |
M CASEY RODGERS |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER Petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #6 ) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall furnish a copy of the petition and this order to Respondent and the Attorney General of the State of Florida. Within NINETY DAYS from the docketing date of this order, Respondent shall file an answer as directed by this order. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 12/11/2020. (alb) Modified on 12/11/2020 copies mailed via certified mail (alb). |
Set Deadlines/Hearings re #7 Order. (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 3/11/2021). (alb) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to MICHAEL J FRANK. (jcw) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by WILLIE GEORGE HARRIS. (jcw) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Comply with Order. Petitioner's deadline is extended to December 21, 2020. (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 12/21/2020.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on December 1, 2020. (jw) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #4 MOTION for Extension of Time to Comply with In Forma Pauperis Order. Referred to MICHAEL J FRANK. (jcw) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to Comply with In Forma Pauperis Order re #3 Order by WILLIE GEORGE HARRIS. (jcw) |
Filing 3 ORDER re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The clerk of court shall forward to Petitioner a form application to proceed in forma pauperis. This case number shall be written on the form. Within THIRTY (30) DAYS (11/19/2020) from the date of this order, Petitioner shall submit payment in the amount of $5.00, or file a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 10/20/2020. (jcw)(Form sent as ordered.) |
Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se (jcw) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (jcw) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by WILLIE GEORGE HARRIS. (Filing fee was not paid. 2 service copies filed.) (jcw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: HARRIS v. INCH | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: WILLIE GEORGE HARRIS | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: MARK INCH | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.