CBHIV LLC v. ADKINSON et al
CBHIV LLC |
MICHAEL A ADKINSON, JR and WALTON COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT |
3:2020cv05917 |
October 30, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
HOPE T CANNON |
M CASEY RODGERS |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement/Certificate of Interested Persons by CBHIV LLC. (BOROWSKI, TADEUSZ) |
Filing 5 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER : Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set for 12/8/2020. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 1/7/2021. Discovery due by 5/24/2021. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 11/24/2020. (alb) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #4 Answer to Complaint. (See proposed ISO.) (alb) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by MICHAEL A ADKINSON, JR. (WARNER, WILLIAM) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by WILLIAM G WARNER on behalf of MICHAEL A ADKINSON, JR, WALTON COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT (WARNER, WILLIAM) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to MICHAEL A ADKINSON, JR, WALTON COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT. (Attachments: #1 Summons Walton County Sheriff Dept.) (alb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AFLNDC-5751343.), filed by CBHIV LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons) (BOROWSKI, TADEUSZ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.