HUTCHINS v. JOHNSON et al
| SHELDON LEE HUTCHINS |
| BOB JOHNSON, ACR SUPERVISOR, ROWELL and UNNAMED DETENTION DEPUTIES |
| 3:2020cv05952 |
| November 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by SHELDON LEE HUTCHINS. (mb) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against ACR SUPERVISOR, BOB JOHNSON, ROWELL, UNNAMED DETENTION DEPUTIES, filed by SHELDON LEE HUTCHINS. (No service copies). (mb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #8 Amended Complaint. (no service copies). Referred to ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY. (mb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #7 MOTION Requesting Court Order To Preserve Video Evidence From Excessive Force Claim At SRCJ. Referred to ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY. (mb) |
| Filing 7 MOTION Requesting Court Order To Preserve Video Evidence From Excessive Force Claim At SRCJ, by SHELDON LEE HUTCHINS. (mb) |
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion to Extend Time. Plaintiff has shown good cause for the extension; therefore, the deadline for him to file an amended complaint and to either pay the filing fee or file an IFP motion is extended to FEBRUARY 2, 2021. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 12/30/2020. (jmw)
|
| Set Deadlines re 6 ORDER. (Filing Fee or IFP Motion due by 2/2/2021. (text order mailed to Pltf). (mb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #5 MOTION to Extend Time. Referred to ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY. (alb) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Extend Time, by SHELDON LEE HUTCHINS. (Clerk confirmed copies of the complaint was mailed to Plaintiff on 12/9/2020.) (alb) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #2 ) is DENIED without prejudice to Plaintiff filing another motion on the court-approved form. The clerk of court is directed to send Plaintiff the correct set of forms needed for filing a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a civil rights complaint form for use by prisoners. Within thirty days of the date of this order, Plaintiff must either file the completed motion to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $400.00 filing fee. Also within thirty days of the date of this order, Plaintiff must file an amended complaint. (IFP Motion or Filing Fee due by 1/2/2021. Amended Complaint due by 1/2/2021). (Forms mailed w/ORDER). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 12/2/2020. (mb)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #1 Complaint. (No service copies). Referred to ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY. (mb) |
| Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se Litigant, SHELDON LEE HUTCHINS. (mb) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by SHELDON LEE HUTCHINS. (mb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ACR SUPERVISOR, BOB JOHNSON, ROWELL, UNNAMED DETENTION DEPUTIES, filed by SHELDON LEE HUTCHINS. (No service copies). (mb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
