GARNER v. JPMORGAN CHASE & CO
| Terri Garner |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. and JPMORGAN CHASE & CO |
| 3:2020cv05961 |
| November 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MICHAEL J FRANK |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER re #9 Plaintiff's MOTION For Leave To File An AMENDED COMPLAINT. On consideration, the amendment is made as a matter of course. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a)(1)(B). Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, ECF No. #12 , is the operative complaint. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 1/27/2021. (mb)
|
| Filing 12 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against JPMORGAN CHASE & CO, filed by TERRI GARNER. (KERNEY, FRANK) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #9 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint. (alb) |
|
Filing 11
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER. Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set for 2/9/2021. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 3/11/2021. Discovery due by 7/26/2021. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 1/26/2021. (alb)
|
| Filing 10 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: Re #9 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint."Counsel is directed to re-file doc # ___9-1____ as a separate pleading pursuant to Local Rule 15.1. ""When leave is sought to amend a pleading pursuant to a motion, the motion and the proposed amended pleading shall each be filed and docketed separately. The proposed amended pleading shall not take effect unless and until the motion to amend is granted""." (alb) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint by TERRI GARNER. (Attachments: #1 First Amended Complaint) (KERNEY, FRANK) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #8 Answer to Complaint. (alb) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. (SIMMS-PETREDIS, JACQUELINE) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 MOTION for Extension of Time to respond to Complaint ( Answer due by 1/25/2021.) Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 12/15/2020. (alb)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (unopposed) by JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. (SIMMS-PETREDIS, JACQUELINE) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by JACQUELINE SIMMS-PETREDIS on behalf of JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (SIMMS-PETREDIS, JACQUELINE) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by TERRI GARNER. JPMORGAN CHASE & CO served on 12/2/2020, answer due 12/23/2020. (KERNEY, FRANK) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (unopposed) (alb) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to JPMorgan Chase & Co. (alb) |
| Filing 2 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: The parties in the above-referenced case were added to the docket incorrectly and will be corrected by the clerk. Party names are to be entered in all caps and without punctuation. For future reference: Please review the procedure for adding/creating new parties in the "Style Guide for Electronic Case Filing" and/or chapter 10 of the "CM/ECF Attorney User's Guide," available at www.flnd.uscourts.gov. (alb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JPMorgan Chase & Co. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AFLNDC-5801858.), filed by Terri Garner. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (KERNEY, FRANK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
