SMITH v. BURGESS et al
| CORY LEE SMITH |
| APRIL BURGESS and BRIDGEWAY CENTER INC |
| 3:2021cv00599 |
| April 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Mail Returned as Return to Sender re: #8 ORDER. (blr) |
| Filing 11 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against BRIDGEWAY CENTER INC, APRIL BURGESS, filed by CORY LEE SMITH. (blr) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #11 Second Amended Complaint. (blr) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Change of Address to General Delivery, Pensacola FL 32591 by CORY LEE SMITH (blr) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Change of Address to PO Box 414, St. Petersburg FL 33731 by CORY LEE SMITH (blr) |
Filing 8
ORDER. Plaintiff is advised that piecemeal pleading is not permitted. If Plaintiff wishes to add factual allegations or attach additional relevant supporting documents to his complaint, he must file a second amended complaint with the documents attached. Plaintiff has thirty days from the date of this order in which to do so. If Plaintiff does not file a second amended complaint within that time, the court will proceed upon the first amended complaint (ECF No. #6 ). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 4/29/2021. (blr)
|
| Set Deadlines re: #8 ORDER. Second Amended Complaint due by 6/1/2021. (blr) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #7 MOTION to clarify amended complaint re #5 Order. Referred to ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY. (blr) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to clarify amended complaint re #5 Order. by CORY LEE SMITH. (Attachments: #1 Amended Claim) (blr) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #6 First Amended Complaint. (blr) |
| Filing 6 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against APRIL BURGESS, filed by CORY LEE SMITH. (blr) (Main Document 6 replaced on 4/21/2021) (blr). |
|
**Duplicate - ORDER denying #4 Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 4/14/2021. (lsd)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER. Plaintiff's #4 MOTION to Amend is DENIED as moot. The clerk of court is directed to send Plaintiff a pro se civil complaint form. Within thirty days of the date of this order, Plaintiff must file either a notice of voluntary dismissal or an amended complaint.( Amended Pleadings due by 5/14/2021.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 4/14/2021. (alb) Modified on 4/14/2021 (Order and form mailed.) (alb).
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Amend Plaintiff(s) by CORY LEE SMITH. (blr) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #4 MOTION to Amend Plaintiff(s). Referred to ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY. (blr) |
| Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se Litigant. (blr) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint. (blr) |
| Filing 2 Filing fee: $ 402.00, receipt number FLN300014498. Fee status updated to paid. (blr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BRIDGEWAY CENTER INC, APRIL BURGESS (Filing fee $402.), filed by CORY LEE SMITH. (two service copies/filing fee paid) (blr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
