BASKIN v. JACOBSEN
| EDWARD L BASKIN |
| KRISTI JACOBSEN |
| 3:2021cv00706 |
| April 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| LACEY A COLLIER |
| ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Within thirty days of the date of this order, Plaintiff must show cause, if any, why this case should not be dismissed for failure to comply with an order of the court. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 6/4/2021. Show Cause Response due by 7/5/2021. (blr)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #3 Order. (no IFP/filing fee paid) (blr) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER. The clerk of court is directed to STRIKE both documents titled Motion to Access to Courts Without Sale, Denial or Delay (ECF Nos. #4 , #5 ) from the docket. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 5/10/2021. (blr)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #4 MOTION TO ACCESS TO COURTS WITHOUT SALE, DENIAL OR DELAY, #5 MOTION TO ACCESS TO COURTS WITHOUT SALE, DENIAL OR DELAY. Referred to ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY. (blr) |
| Filing 5 Stricken per #6 ORDER. MOTION TO ACCESS TO COURTS WITHOUT SALE, DENIAL OR DELAY by EDWARD L BASKIN. (blr) Modified on 5/10/2021 (blr). |
| Filing 4 Stricken per #6 ORDER. MOTION TO ACCESS TO COURTS WITHOUT SALE, DENIAL OR DELAY by EDWARD L BASKIN. (blr) Modified on 5/10/2021 (blr). |
|
Filing 3
ORDER. The clerk of court is directed to send Plaintiff a civil rights complaint form for use by prisoners, a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, and a prisoner consent form and financial certificate approved for use in the Northern District. This case number should be written on the forms. Within thirty days of the date of this order, Plaintiff must either pay the $402.00 filing fee or file a fully completed motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Fee due by 5/26/2021.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 4/26/2021. (Forms mailed w/Order.) (blr)
|
| Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se Litigant. (blr) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint. (blr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against KRISTI JACOBSEN, filed by EDWARD L BASKIN. (no service copies/no IFP/no filing fee paid) (blr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: BASKIN v. JACOBSEN | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: KRISTI JACOBSEN | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: EDWARD L BASKIN | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
