M & R HIGH POINT HOLDINGS INC v. STARR SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY
| M & R HIGH POINT HOLDINGS, INC., and M & R HIGH POINT HOLDINGS INC |
| STARR SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY |
| 3:2021cv00851 |
| June 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| HOPE T CANNON |
| T KENT WETHERELL |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER TOLLING DEADLINES. Upon due consideration of the parties' joint motion for enlargement of time, Doc #9 it is Ordered that the motion is GRANTED and the deadlines in the Initial Scheduling Order are tolled for 60 days, as is the deadline for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant's motion to dismiss. The parties shall file a status report by the end of the 60- day period (September 7, 2021.) Re: #9 Joint MOTION to Extend Time. ( Status Report due by 9/7/2021.) Signed by JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II on 7/9/2021. (alb) Modified on 7/12/2021 to edit docket text (alb).
|
| Filing 9 Joint MOTION to Extend Time to Comply with the Court's Initial Scheduling Order dated July 2, 2021 by M & R HIGH POINT HOLDINGS INC. (DUNNAVANT, ERIN) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME, re #7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response #4 MOTION to Dismiss. (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 7/13/2021). Signed by JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II on 7/6/2021. (alb)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #4 MOTION to Dismiss by M & R HIGH POINT HOLDINGS INC. (DUNNAVANT, ERIN) |
|
Filing 6
SCHEDULING ORDER: Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set for 7/16/2021. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 8/16/2021. Discovery due by 10/29/2021. Signed by JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II on 7/2/2021. (blr)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by ERIN E DUNNAVANT on behalf of M & R HIGH POINT HOLDINGS INC (DUNNAVANT, ERIN) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II notified that action is needed Re: #5 Notice of Appearance. (Please see proposed ISO.) (alb) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss by STARR SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY. (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 7/6/2021). (TURETZKY, BROOKE) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement/Certificate of Interested Persons by STARR SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY identifying Corporate Parent STARR INDEMNITY & LIABILITY COMPANY, Corporate Parent STARR INDEMNITY & LIABILITY COMPANY, Corporate Parent STARR GLOBAL HOLDINGS AG, Corporate Parent STARR GLOBAL HOLDINGS AG, Corporate Parent Starr Global Financial, Inc., Corporate Parent Starr Global Financial, Inc., Corporate Parent Starr Insurance Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent Starr International Company, Inc. for STARR SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY.. (TURETZKY, BROOKE) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE REGARDING ADMISSION TO PRACTICE, mailed to Attorney Matthew R. Danahy Esq., 901 W. Swann Ave., Tampa, FL 33606. (alb) Modified on 6/15/2021 to add docket text. (alb). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by STARR SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLNDC-6134835.), filed by STARR SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Documentation filed in State Court) (TURETZKY, BROOKE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
