YOUNG v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
Plaintiff: FREDERICK LEE YOUNG
Defendant: STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and WALTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Case Number: 3:2021cv00958
Filed: August 12, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: HOPE T CANNON
Referring Judge: LACEY A COLLIER
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER. Plaintiffs fourth Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF Doc. #14 ) is MOOT. The Court has already denied Plaintiff indigency status and ordered him to pay the full filing fee. ECF Doc. #13 . Pursuant to the Courts prior order, Plaintiff is reminded that he has until 10/8/2021 to pay the Court's $402.00 filing. If Plaintiff no longer wishes to proceed with this matter, he may file a voluntary notice of dismissal. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order as instructed may result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 9/20/2021. (mb)
September 17, 2021 Filing 14 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by FREDERICK LEE YOUNG. (mb)
September 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Plaintiffs Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF Doc. #10 ) is DENIED. Within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this order, Plaintiff shall submit the $402.00 filing fee to the clerk. (Filing Fee due by 10/8/2021.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 9/17/2021. (mb)
September 17, 2021 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #14 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (mb)
September 15, 2021 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #12 RESPONSE re 11 Order, by FREDERICK LEE YOUNG. (6 month financial statement). (mb)
September 14, 2021 Filing 12 RESPONSE re #11 Order, by FREDERICK LEE YOUNG. (6 month financial statement). (mb)
August 27, 2021 Opinion or Order **Duplicate - ORDER deferring ruling on #10 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 8/27/2021. (lsd)
August 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER. The Court will DEFER ruling on Plaintiff's third motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Doc. #10 ) to allow Plaintiff an opportunity to provide an executed financial certificate and a statement of his inmate account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of the complaint. Plaintiff shall file an executed financial certificate and a 6-month statement by September 17, 2021. Alternatively, Plaintiff shall pay the full filing fee of $402.00 by that date. If Plaintiff does not provide an executed financial certificate and 6-month statement by the deadline above, the Court will DENY the third motion to proceed in forma pauperis and will recommend this action for dismissal. (Executed Financial Certificate and 6-month statement due by 9/17/2021.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 8/27/2021. (mb)
August 25, 2021 Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by FREDERICK LEE YOUNG. (mb)
August 25, 2021 Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF FLORIDA, filed by FREDERICK LEE YOUNG. (No service copies). (mb)
August 25, 2021 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #10 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #9 Amended Complaint. (No service copies). Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (mb)
August 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER. Plaintiff's second "motion to proceed in forma pauperis" (ECF Doc. #6 ) is DENIED. Plaintiff is reminded that he has until September 7, 20212, to file a second amended complaint on this Court's official form and a third application to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff alternatively may pay the full $402.00 filing fee. (Deadline to file Third Application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay filing fee by 9/7/2021.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 8/20/2021. (mb)
August 18, 2021 Filing 7 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: Re: #5 Amended Complaint #6 Second MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. At direction of chambers, case 3:21-cv-959-LC-HTC appears to be a duplicate of this case. Clerk to refile doc #1 Complaint and doc #2 IFP from case 3:21-cv-959-LC-HTC into this case and close case 3:21-cv-959-LC-HTC. (alb)
August 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER. Plaintiff's "motion to proceed in forma pauperis" (ECF Doc. #2 ) is DENIED. The clerk shall send to Plaintiff a section 1983 Civil Rights Complaint form for prisoners and a form application to proceed in forma pauperis for prisoners. Within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this order, Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint on this Court's official form and a second complete application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the full $402.00 filing fee. (Filing Fee or completed IFP due by 9/6/2021. Amended Complaint due 9/6/2021.) (Forms mailed w/ORDER). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 8/16/2021. (mb)
August 13, 2021 Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se Litigant, FREDERICK LEE YOUNG. (mb)
August 13, 2021 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #1 Complaint. (No service copies). Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (mb)
August 12, 2021 Filing 6 (Second) MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by FREDERICK LEE YOUNG. (alb)
August 12, 2021 Filing 5 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WALTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, filed by FREDERICK LEE YOUNG. (No service copies.) (alb)
August 12, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by FREDERICK LEE YOUNG. (mb)
August 12, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF FLORIDA, WALTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, filed by FREDERICK LEE YOUNG. (No service copies). (mb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: YOUNG v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: FREDERICK LEE YOUNG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STATE OF FLORIDA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WALTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?