DONOVAN v. INCH
Petitioner: TIMOTHY JOHN DONOVAN
Respondent: STATE OF FLORIDA and MARK S INCH
Case Number: 3:2021cv01027
Filed: September 13, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: MICHAEL J FRANK
Referring Judge: M CASEY RODGERS
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 26, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by ANNE CATHERINE CONLEY on behalf of MARK S INCH (CONLEY, ANNE)
October 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The Clerk of Court shall furnish a copy of the petition, supporting memorandum, and this order to Respondent and the Attorney General of the State of Florida. Within NINETY (90) DAYS (1/3/2022) from the docketing date of this order, Respondent shall file an answer as directed by this order. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 10/4/2021. (jcw)(cc: Respondent; Attorney General)
October 1, 2021 Filing 5 Habeas Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number FLN3-14894. Fee status updated to paid. (mb)
October 1, 2021 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: 5 Habeas Filing Fee Received. (mb)
September 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The clerk of court shall change the docket to reflect that the Respondent in this action is Mark S. Inch, Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections. The clerk of court shall forward to Petitioner a form application to proceed in forma pauperis. This case number shall be written on the form. On or before 10/18/2021, Petitioner shall submit payment in the amount of $5.00, or file a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 9/16/2021. (jcw)(Form sent as ordered.)
September 15, 2021 Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se (jcw)
September 15, 2021 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #2 Memorandum in Support, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (jcw)
September 13, 2021 Filing 2 Summary of Facts and Memorandum of Law re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by TIMOTHY JOHN DONOVAN. (jcw)
September 13, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by TIMOTHY JOHN DONOVAN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(Filing fee was not paid. 2 service copies filed.) (jcw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DONOVAN v. INCH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: TIMOTHY JOHN DONOVAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: STATE OF FLORIDA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MARK S INCH
Represented By: ANNE CATHERINE CONLEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?