MEADOWS v. HILL-KELLY DODGE, INC.
TAMMY MEADOWS |
HILL-KELLY DODGE, INC. |
3:2021cv03697 |
December 3, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
T KENT WETHERELL |
Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 SCHEDULING AND MEDIATION ORDER Re: #10 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. ( Discovery due by 1/20/2023. Dispositive Motions to be filed by 2/10/2023. Mediation to take place by 12/16/2022. Mediation Report due by 12/23/2022.) ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. Signed by JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II on 1/27/2022. (alb) |
Filing 10 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (HAYDEN, BRIAN) |
Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement/Certificate of Interested Persons by HILL-KELLY DODGE, INC.. (HAYDEN, BRIAN) |
Filing 8 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by HILL-KELLY DODGE, INC.. (HAYDEN, BRIAN) |
Filing 7 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER : Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set for 1/18/2022. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 2/17/2022. Discovery due by 4/4/2022. Dispositive Motion due by 4/25/2022. Signed by JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II on 1/4/2022. (alb) Modified on 1/4/2022 to add dispositive motions deadline (alb). |
Filing 6 ORDER. The #4 motion is GRANTED, and Defendant shall have until January 17, 2022, to answer or otherwise respond to the #1 complaint. ( Answer due by 1/17/2022.) Signed by JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II on 1/4/2022. (alb) |
Set Deadlines/Hearings re #7 Initial Scheduling Order. Dispositive Motions to be filed by 4/25/2022. (alb) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II notified that action is needed Re: #4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint. (Please see proposed ISO.) (alb) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by GRETA ROSE MORRIS on behalf of HILL-KELLY DODGE, INC. (MORRIS, GRETA) |
Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by HILL-KELLY DODGE, INC.. (HAYDEN, BRIAN) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by TAMMY MEADOWS (CONNORS, CLAYTON) |
Set Deadlines/Hearings, re #3 Return of Service, #1 Complaint. Answer due by 1/3/2022. (alb) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to HILL-KELLY DODGE, INC.. (alb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against HILL-KELLY DODGE, INC. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLNDC-6571599.), filed by TAMMY MEADOWS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (CONNORS, CLAYTON) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: MEADOWS v. HILL-KELLY DODGE, INC. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: TAMMY MEADOWS | |
Represented By: | CLAYTON MORRIS CONNORS |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: HILL-KELLY DODGE, INC. | |
Represented By: | BRIAN LEE HAYDEN |
Represented By: | GRETA ROSE MORRIS |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.