COOK v. 3M COMPANY et al
NATHAN DANIEL COOK |
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO LLC and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC |
3:2022cv00714 |
January 17, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
HOPE T CANNON |
GARY R JONES |
M CASEY RODGERS |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: Notice to Filer - MDL cases originating in the same district as the master MDL Docket are referred to as direct file MDL cases. When filing a direct complaint please choose origin code, 8 Multidistrict Litigation - Direct File (not 1 Original Proceeding). The code has been added to the civil cover sheet, (JS 44 (Rev. 06/17). Also, when opening the civil case please enter Lead case number 3:19md2885, Association type (Multi-district Litigation) and JPML no. 2885. Clerk will reassign judges, correct origin code and all other case data information. (djb) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (AZIZ, MUHAMMAD) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLNDC-6630525.), filed by NATHAN DANIEL COOK. (AZIZ, MUHAMMAD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.