GARCIA v. THE GEO GROUP INC et al
| JUAN M GARCIA |
| THE GEO GROUP INC, DANIEL YOUNG and DANIEL MILLER |
| 3:2022cv01400 |
| February 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| HOPE T CANNON |
| T KENT WETHERELL |
| Prisoner Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set for 4/14/2022. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 5/16/2022. Discovery due by 7/27/2022. Signed by JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II on 3/31/2022. (jcw)
|
| Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint #12 by DANIEL MILLER. (WARNER, TIMOTHY) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER re #11 MOTION to Dismiss. The amended complaint (Doc #12 ) is now the operative complaint. Defendant Geo Group's motion to dismiss (Doc. #11 ) is DENIED as moot. Defendants Geo Group and Miller shall have 14 days from the date of this Order to respond to the amended complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(3). Defendant Young shall respond to the amended complaint with the time provided in Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1). (Responsive pleadings due by 4/11/2022.) Signed by JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II on 3/28/2022. (jcw)
|
| Filing 12 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants All Defendants., filed by JUAN M GARCIA. (MATTOX, MARIE) Modified on 3/28/2022 to edit from Second to First Amended Complaint (jcw). |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss by THE GEO GROUP INC. (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 3/25/2022). (SEAGLE, SCOTT) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by JUAN M GARCIA. DANIEL MILLER served on 2/9/2022, answer due 3/2/2022. (MATTOX, MARIE) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by JUAN M GARCIA. THE GEO GROUP INC served on 2/10/2022, answer due 3/3/2022. (MATTOX, MARIE) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME re #6 Motion to Extend Time. The motion is GRANTED, and The Geo Group, Inc., shall have until March 11, 2022, to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 3/11/2022). Signed by JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II on 03/02/2022. (mah)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting Defendant GEO Group, Inc.'s Stipulated Motion to Extend Time to file a response to the complaint. Defendant's response is due on or before March 11, 2022. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 03/02/2022. (HTC)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #6 MOTION to Extend Time(Stipulated) to Respond to Complaint. Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (alb) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Extend Time(Stipulated) to Respond to Complaint by THE GEO GROUP INC. (SEAGLE, SCOTT) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by DANIEL MILLER. (WARNER, TIMOTHY) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by TIMOTHY M WARNER on behalf of DANIEL MILLER (WARNER, TIMOTHY) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to DANIEL MILLER, THE GEO GROUP INC, DANIEL YOUNG. (jcw) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (MATTOX, MARIE) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DANIEL MILLER, THE GEO GROUP INC, DANIEL YOUNG ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLNDC-6664368.), filed by JUAN M GARCIA. (Attachments: #1 Summons to be issued by clerk, #2 Summons to be issued by clerk, #3 summons to be issued by clerk) (MATTOX, MARIE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
