CARROLL v. JOSEPH
| VICTOR CARROLL |
| M V JOSEPH |
| 3:2022cv02056 |
| February 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| LACEY A COLLIER |
| ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Set Deadlines: Show Cause Response - two complete copies of his 2241 petition due by 4/28/2022. (jfj) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #6 Response to Order to Show Cause. (jfj) |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by VICTOR CARROLL. (jfj) |
| Filing 5 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number FLN300015274. Fee status updated to paid. (jfj) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: 5 Filing Fee Received. (jfj) |
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this order, Petitioner must show cause, if any, why this case should not be dismissed for failure to comply with a court order. Alternatively, Petitioner may submit either the $5.00 filing fee or a properly completed in forma pauperis application, and two complete copies of his 2241 petition, within the same time. Petitioner's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation of dismissal of this case. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 03/29/22. (Show Cause Response due by 4/28/2022.) (jfj)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by VICTOR CARROLL. The clerk of court is directed to send Petitioner the required forms for seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis, with this case number written on the forms. Within thirty days of the date of this order, Petitioner must either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis with the required attachments. Petitioner's failure to comply with an order of the court will result in a recommendation of dismissal of this case. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 02/22/22. (Filing Fee or IFP Motion due by 3/24/2022.)(Forms mailed as directed.) (jfj)
|
| Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se Litigant. (jfj) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by VICTOR CARROLL.(No service copies, IFP motion, or fee received.) (jfj) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (jfj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: CARROLL v. JOSEPH | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: VICTOR CARROLL | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: M V JOSEPH | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
