BOYLES et al v. AXIS SURPLUS INSURANCE COMPANY
| KARL W. BOYLES, JR. and BOYLES & BOYLES, PLLC |
| AXIS SURPLUS INSURANCE COMPANY |
| 3:2022cv04174 |
| March 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| HOPE T CANNON |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement/Certificate of Interested Persons by BOYLES & BOYLES, PLLC. (CRAWFORD, CHRISTOPHER) |
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement/Certificate of Interested Persons by AXIS SURPLUS INSURANCE COMPANY identifying Corporate Parent AXIS INSURANCE COMPANY, Other Affiliate AXIS CAPITAL HOLDINGS LIMITED, Other Affiliate AXIS SPECIALTY GLOBAL HOLDINGS LIMITED, Other Affiliate T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc., Other Affiliate The Vanguard Group, Other Affiliate AXIS Specialty U.S. Holdings, Inc. for AXIS SURPLUS INSURANCE COMPANY.. (LEWIS, WILLIAM) |
| Filing 8 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (LEWIS, WILLIAM) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #8 PROPOSED JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (jfj) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #5 MOTION to Compel Appraisal & Stay Proceedings and #7 Response in Opposition to Motion. (jfj) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION to Compel Appraisal & Stay Proceedings filed by AXIS SURPLUS INSURANCE COMPANY. (LEWIS, WILLIAM) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement/Certificate of Interested Persons by AXIS SURPLUS INSURANCE COMPANY identifying Corporate Parent AXIS INSURANCE COMPANY, Other Affiliate AXIS CAPITAL HOLDINGS LIMITED, Other Affiliate AXIS SPECIALTY GLOBAL HOLDINGS LIMITED, Other Affiliate T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc., Other Affiliate The Vanguard Group, Other Affiliate AXIS Specialty U.S. Holdings, Inc. for AXIS SURPLUS INSURANCE COMPANY.. (LEWIS, WILLIAM) |
| Motion No Longer Referred: #5 MOTION to Compel Appraisal & Stay Proceedings. (Clerk will set response deadline.) (jfj) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #5 MOTION to Compel Appraisal & Stay Proceedings. (jfj) |
| Set Deadlines re: #5 MOTION to Compel Appraisal & Stay Proceedings. (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 4/12/2022). (jfj) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Compel Appraisal & Stay Proceedings by KARL W. BOYLES, JR, BOYLES & BOYLES, PLLC. (CRAWFORD, CHRISTOPHER) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by AXIS SURPLUS INSURANCE COMPANY. (LEWIS, WILLIAM) |
Filing 3
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set for 4/5/2022. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 5/5/2022. Discovery due by 9/14/2022. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 03/22/22. (jfj)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #1 Notice of Removal. (Please see proposed ISO.) (jfj) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (LEWIS, WILLIAM) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by AXIS SURPLUS INSURANCE COMPANY from Escambia County Circuit Court, case number 2022-CA-000346. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLNDC-6834136.), filed by AXIS SURPLUS INSURANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3) (LEWIS, WILLIAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
