MCLAIN v. POWELL
| Mr. Brandon W McLain and BRANDON W MCLAIN |
| WILLIAM POWELL |
| 3:2022cv05441 |
| April 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| HOPE T CANNON |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: Re #8 Mail Returned. (Resent to Director RICH POWELL, ESCAMBIA COUNTY CORRECTIONS, 2251 N. PALAFOX ST, PENSACOLA, FL 32501). (mb) |
| Filing 8 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Not Deliverable as addressed. Re: #6 AMENDED ORDER REQUIRING SERVICE COPIES, SERVICE OF THE PETITION, AND A RESPONSE BY THE STATE. (jcw) |
| Filing 7 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: Re #6 Order. Received 2 service copies from attorney, GLENN M SWIATEK, via FED EX. Service copy w/ORDER, doc. #6 and ORDER, doc. #5 sent to both the Respondent and Attorney General of Florida as instructed. (mb) |
Filing 6
AMENDED ORDER REQUIRING SERVICE COPIES, SERVICE OF THE PETITION, AND A RESPONSE BY THE STATE. Within seven (7) days from the date of this order, Petitioner shall provide two (2) service copies of the petition (ECF Doc. #4 ) to the clerk. Upon receipt of the service copies, the clerk shall serve the petition, this order, and the May 3, 2022, Order (ECF Doc. #5 ) on Respondent and on the Attorney General of the State of Florida. Respondent shall have ninety (90) days from the date of service to filean answer consistent the requirements set forth in the May 3, 2022 Order.(2 Service Copies due by 5/13/2022.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 5/6/2022. (mb)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER REQUIRING SERVICE COPIES, SERVICE OF THE PETITION, AND A RESPONSE BY THE STATE. Petitioner shall provide two (2) service copies of the petition (ECF Doc. #4 ) to the clerk. Upon receipt of the service copies, the clerk shall serve the petition and this order on Respondent and on the Attorney General of the State of Florida. Respondent shall have ninety (90) days from the date of this order to file an answer as directed by this order. (Answer due by 8/1/2022.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 5/3/2022. (mb)
|
| Filing 4 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number AFLNDC-6972895.), filed by BRANDON W MCLAIN. (SWIATEK, GLENN) |
| Filing 3 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: The referenced document has been filed incorrectly. To insure the accuracy of the docket and proper reporting the document should be reposted using the correct event located under > Civil > Complaints and Other Initiating Documents > Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (mb) |
| Filing 2 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: The parties in the above-referenced case were added to the docket incorrectly and will be corrected by the clerk. Party names are to be entered in all caps and without punctuation. For future reference: Please review the procedure for adding/creating new parties in the "Style Guide for Electronic Case Filing" and/or chapter 10 of the "CM/ECF Attorney User's Guide," available at www.flnd.uscourts.gov. (mb) |
| Filing 1 *INCORRECT EVENT UTILIZED - Please disregard. Refer to ECF Docket entry #4 . NOTICE OF REMOVAL by BRANDON W MCLAIN from Escambia County Florida Circuit Court, case number 2018 CF 3299. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLNDC-6971569.), filed by BRANDON W MCLAIN. (SWIATEK, GLENN) Modified on 5/2/2022 to correct event. (mb). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
