MCINTYRE v. POWELL et al
ANTHONY MAURICE MCINTYRE |
WILLIAM POWELL and ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL |
3:2022cv05526 |
April 22, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
ZACHARY C BOLITHO |
M CASEY RODGERS |
ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: #6 ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Plaintiff must pay the initial partial filing fee within thirty days of the date of this order. (Initial partial filing fee not received.) (jfj) |
Filing 7 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO for all further proceedings. MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY no longer assigned to case. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 5/23/2022. (lsd) **Please use the new judge's initials for all future filings: 3:22cv5526-MCR-ZCB. |
Filing 6 ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS re #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The clerk of court is directed to assess Plaintiff an initial partial filing fee in the amount of $67.00 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff must pay the initial partial filing fee within thirty days of the date of this order. The clerk of court is directed to mail a copy of this order with the appropriate cover letter to the Escambia County Jail, Finance Department, 6400 North W Street, Pensacola, Florida 32505, Attention: Reshonda Watson. (Fee due by 6/13/2022.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 5/13/2022. (jcw)(cc: Escambia County Jail) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by ANTHONY MAURICE MCINTYRE. (jfj) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY. (jfj) |
Filing 4 ORDER. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #2 ) is DENIED without prejudice. The clerk of court is directed to send Plaintiff a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a Prisoner Consent Form and Financial Certificate approved for use in the Northern District. This case number should be written on the forms. Within thirty days of the date of docketing of this order Plaintiff must either (1) pay the $402.00 filing fee, or (2) file a completed motion to proceed in forma pauperis with the requisite Prisoner Consent Form and Financial Certificate signed by a prison official, and an attached computer printout of the transactions in Plaintiff's inmate account during the preceding six-month period. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 04/26/22. (Filing Fee or IFP Motion due by 5/26/2022.) (Forms mailed as directed.) (jfj) |
Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se Litigant. (jfj) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint and #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY. (jfj) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by ANTHONY MAURICE MCINTYRE. (jfj) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by ANTHONY MAURICE MCINTYRE. (No service copies received. IFP motion received.) (jfj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.