BROCK v. 3M COMPANY et al
| Charles Brock |
| 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO LLC and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC |
| 3:2022cv08057 |
| June 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| GARY R JONES |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT against CHARLES BROCK ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLNDC-7188553.), filed by CHARLES BROCK. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (FERRARO, JAMES) |
| Filing 4 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: NOTICE TO FILER - Please file the Complaint in this case. You will be prompted to pay the filing fee when the complaint is filed. This case is a direct filed case not a transition. You cannot docket 1 Notice of Transition in a direct filed case when opening a new civil case. No judges were assigned. (djb) |
| JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS and MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES added. (djb) |
| Filing 3 REFILED SHORT FORM COMPLAINT and Jury Trial Demand against All Defendants, filed by Charles Brock. (FERRARO, JAMES) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF DESIGNATED FORUM - MDPA by Charles Brock (FERRARO, JAMES) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF TRANSITION by Charles Brock (FERRARO, JAMES) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
