LESHNOV v. OAKLEA SIMPSON SECURITY LLC
Plaintiff: JAMIE LESHNOV
Defendant: OAKLEA SIMPSON SECURITY, LLC and OAKLEA SIMPSON SECURITY LLC
Case Number: 3:2022cv08122
Filed: June 14, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: HOPE T CANNON
Referring Judge: T KENT WETHERELL
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER granting #13 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Joshua A. Glikin is authorized to appear pro hac vice for Defendant. Signed by JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II on 08/11/2022. (alb) Modified on 8/11/2022 to correct attorney name (alb). (Main Document 14 replaced on 8/11/2022) (alb).
August 10, 2022 Filing 13 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Joshua A. Glikin.( Filing fee $ 208 receipt number AFLNDC-7375149.) by OAKLEA SIMPSON SECURITY LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (GLIKIN, JOSHUA)
August 10, 2022 ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II notified that action is needed Re: #13 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Joshua A. Glikin.( Filing fee $ 208 receipt number AFLNDC-7375149.) (alb)
August 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER. This case is before the Court based on the motion for leave to appear pro hac vice filed by attorney Lauren M. Upton (Doc. #11 ). The Court finds based on the motion and supporting documentation that Ms. Upton meets the requirements of Local Rule 11.1 to appear pro hac vice. The Court also notes that the applicable fee has been paid. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED, and attorney Lauren M. Upton is authorized to appear pro hac vice for Defendant. Signed by JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II on 08/05/22. (jfj)
August 5, 2022 ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II notified that action is needed Re: #11 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Lauren M. Upton.( Filing fee $ 208 receipt number AFLNDC-7365452.) (jfj)
August 4, 2022 Filing 11 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Lauren M. Upton.( Filing fee $ 208 receipt number AFLNDC-7365452.) by OAKLEA SIMPSON SECURITY LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (UPTON, LAUREN)
August 4, 2022 Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by OAKLEA SIMPSON SECURITY LLC. (RICHARDSON, JENNIFER)
July 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set for 8/10/2022. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 9/9/2022. Discovery due by 11/28/2022. Signed by JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II on 07/27/22. (jfj)
July 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME. Upon due consideration of Defendant's consented motion for extension of time (Doc. #7 ), it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED, and Defendant shall have until August 4, 2022, to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. Signed by JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II on 07/27/22. (OAKLEA SIMPSON SECURITY LLC answer/response due 8/4/2022.) (jfj)
July 27, 2022 ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint, #5 Notice of Appearance, #8 Order. (Please see proposed ISO.) (jfj)
July 26, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint , Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Plaintiff's Complaint by OAKLEA SIMPSON SECURITY LLC. (RICHARDSON, JENNIFER)
July 26, 2022 Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement/Certificate of Interested Persons by OAKLEA SIMPSON SECURITY LLC. (RICHARDSON, JENNIFER)
July 26, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by JENNIFER SHOAF RICHARDSON on behalf of OAKLEA SIMPSON SECURITY LLC (RICHARDSON, JENNIFER)
July 6, 2022 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by JAMIE LESHNOV. OAKLEA SIMPSON SECURITY LLC served on 7/6/2022, answer due 7/27/2022. (CONNORS, CLAYTON)
June 15, 2022 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to OAKLEA SIMPSON SECURITY LLC. (jfj)
June 14, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (CONNORS, CLAYTON)
June 14, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against OAKLEA SIMPSON SECURITY, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLNDC-7189319.), filed by JAMIE LESHNOV. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (CONNORS, CLAYTON)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LESHNOV v. OAKLEA SIMPSON SECURITY LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JAMIE LESHNOV
Represented By: CLAYTON MORRIS CONNORS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OAKLEA SIMPSON SECURITY, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OAKLEA SIMPSON SECURITY LLC
Represented By: ERICK M DRLICKA
Represented By: JENNIFER SHOAF RICHARDSON
Represented By: JOSHUA GLIKIN
Represented By: LAUREN MISTRETTA UPTON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?