DAVIS v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Plaintiff: ROBERT L DAVIS
Defendant: UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Case Number: 3:2022cv08458
Filed: June 15, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: ZACHARY C BOLITHO
Referring Judge: LACEY A COLLIER
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 11, 2022 Filing 11 CLERK'S JUDGMENT re #10 Order Adopting Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. (90 Day Deadline set for 11/9/2022 to dispose working file pursuant to retention policy). (mb)
August 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge's #8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. This action be DISMISSED without prejudice, under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g), based on Plaintiff's failure to pay the filing fee at the time he commenced this case. Plaintiff's "Motion to Have Constitutional Challenge Served on Respondent" (Doc. #6 ) be DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this order and close the case. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 8/11/2022. (mb)
August 8, 2022 ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER notified that action is needed Re: #9 OBJECTION to Magistrate's #8 Report and Recommendations. (mb)
August 5, 2022 Filing 9 OBJECTION to Magistrate's #8 Report and Recommendations, by ROBERT L DAVIS. (mb)
July 27, 2022 Opinion or Order **Duplicate - ORDER granting #5 Motion ; denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO on 7/27/2022. (lsd)
July 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. RECOMMENDED - This action be DISMISSED without prejudice, under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g), based on Plaintiff's failure to pay the filing fee at the time he commenced this case. Plaintiff's "Motion to Have Constitutional Challenge Served on Respondent" (Doc. #6 ) be DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Court be directed to close this case. R&R flag set. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO on 7/27/2022. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 8/24/2022. (mb)
July 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. ORDERED - The Court's previous order granting Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #4 ) is VACATED. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is now DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this order to the FloridaDepartment of Corrections, 501 South Calhoun St., Tallahassee, FL 32399-2500, Attention: Agency Clerk. Plaintiff's "Motion to Terminate The PLRA Filing Fee Lien" (Doc. #5 ) is GRANTED. (Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 8/24/2022.) (Copy of ORDER sent to DOC as instructed). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO on 7/27/2022. (mb)
July 11, 2022 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: #5 MOTION To Terminate The (PLRA) Filing Fee Lien, #6 MOTION To Have Constitutional Challenge Served on Respondent. Referred to ZACHARY C BOLITHO. (mb)
July 8, 2022 Filing 6 MOTION To Have Constitutional Challenge Served on Respondent, by ROBERT L DAVIS. (mb)
July 8, 2022 Filing 5 MOTION To Terminate The (PLRA) Filing Fee Lien, by ROBERT L DAVIS. (mb)
June 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 VACATED per #7 ORDER. ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is GRANTED to the extent the case may proceed without prepayment of the entire filing fee. Because Plaintiff has no funds accrued in his prison trust fund account, the Court will not assess Plaintiff an initial partial filing fee as provided in 28 U.S.C. 1915(b) (1)(A). However, the total filing fee in this case remains $350.00. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order, with the appropriate cover letter to: Santa Rosa County Jail, Programs Department, P.O. Box 7129, Milton, Florida 32572. (Order and letter mailed as directed.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO on 06/22/2022. (alb) Modified on 7/27/2022 (mb).
June 17, 2022 Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se litigant. (alb)
June 17, 2022 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #1 Complaint. Referred to ZACHARY C BOLITHO. (alb)
June 15, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by ROBERT L DAVIS. (alb) Modified on 6/17/2022 (alb).
June 15, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, filed by ROBERT L DAVIS. (No service copies.) (alb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DAVIS v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ROBERT L DAVIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?