DELICES v. TUCKER
| VILES DELICES |
| PRESTON TUCKER |
| 3:2022cv09551 |
| July 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| ZACHARY C BOLITHO |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion to Extend Time. Plaintiff has shown good cause for extending the deadline to pay the filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis; therefore, that deadline is extended to OCTOBER 12, 2022. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO on 08/17/2022. (jmw)
|
| Set Deadlines re 6 ORDER. (Filing Fee or IFP MOTION due by 10/12/2022. (mb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: #5 Plaintiff's MOTION to Extend The Time To File The In Forma Pauperis MOTION. Referred to ZACHARY C BOLITHO. (mb) |
| Filing 5 Plaintiff's MOTION to Extend The Time To File The In Forma Pauperis MOTION, by VILES DELICES. (mb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: #4 ORDER. (Notice of Voluntary Dismissal or Filing Fee or IFP MOTION due by 8/12/2022). (Fee not paid/no IFP Motion filed and no Notice of dismissal received). (mb) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER. Plaintiff's "Motion to Accept Previous Indigency Determination as Applicable to This Filing" (Doc. #2 ) is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Plaintiff a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a Prisoner Consent Form and Financial Certificate. Within thirty days of the date of this order Plaintiff must: a. file a notice of voluntary dismissal; OR b. submit payment in the amount of $402.00; OR c. file a complete application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO on 7/12/2022. (Form mailed w/ORDER). (mb)
|
| Set Deadlines re #4 ORDER. (Notice of Voluntary Dismissal or Filing Fee or IFP MOTION due by 8/12/2022). (mb) |
| Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se Litigant, VILES DELICES. (mb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint (no service copies), #2 Plaintiff's MOTION To Accept Previous Indigency Determination As Applicable To This Filing. Referred to ZACHARY C BOLITHO. (mb) |
| Filing 2 Plaintiff's MOTION To Accept Previous Indigency Determination As Applicable To This Filing, by VILES DELICES. (mb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PRESTON TUCKER, filed by VILES DELICES. (No service copies). (mb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: DELICES v. TUCKER | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: VILES DELICES | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: PRESTON TUCKER | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
