SCOTT v. ARAMARK
Plaintiff: TYLER ROBERT SCOTT
Defendant: ARA MARK and ARAMARK
Case Number: 3:2022cv22212
Filed: November 3, 2022
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: HOPE T CANNON
Referring Judge: LACEY A COLLIER
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 1, 2023 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #5 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Initial Partial Filing Fee due by 12/23/2022. (Fee not received.) (jfj)
December 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF Doc. #4 , is GRANTED to the extent this case may proceed without prepayment of the entire filing fee. Within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall pay the clerk an initial partial filing fee of $5.39. However, the total filing fee in this case remains $350.00. The clerk shall mail a copy of this order with the appropriate cover letter to: The Department of Corrections. (SEE FULL ORDER) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 12/02/22. (Initial Partial Filing Fee due by 12/23/2022.) (Documents mailed as directed.) (jfj)
November 29, 2022 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (jfj)
November 23, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by TYLER ROBERT SCOTT. (jfj)
November 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER. The clerk shall send Plaintiff a complete set of forms needed to file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. This case number should be written on the forms. Within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall either file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $402.00 filing fee. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 11/07/22. (IFP motion or Fee due by 11/28/2022.) (Forms mailed as directed.) (jfj)
November 4, 2022 Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se Litigant. (jfj)
November 4, 2022 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint. (jfj)
November 3, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ARAMARK, filed by TYLER ROBERT SCOTT. (No service copies, fee, or IFP motion received.) (jfj) Modified on 11/7/2022 (mgd).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SCOTT v. ARAMARK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TYLER ROBERT SCOTT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ARA MARK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ARAMARK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?