JOHNSON v. SCOTT
| RODNEY DEWAYNE JOHNSON |
| A SCOTT |
| 3:2023cv00105 |
| January 5, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| HOPE T CANNON |
| LACEY A COLLIER |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to RODNEY DEWAYNE JOHNSON Re: #5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. (Forwarding address not found. See also docket entry #4 Mail Returned as Undeliverable.) (jfj) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER notified that action is needed Re: #6 Mail Returned. (jfj) |
Filing 5
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - This case be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for Plaintiffs failure to prosecute, failure to comply with a Court order, and failure to keep the Court apprised of his address. The clerk be directed to close the file. R&R flag set. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 2/3/2023. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 3/3/2023. (mb)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #3 Order. IFP Motion or Filing Fee due by 1/27/2023. (Fee not paid and IFP MOTION not received). (Mail returned/no forwarding address on file). (mb) |
| Filing 4 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to RODNEY DEWAYNE JOHNSON Re: #2 Notice to Pro Se Litigant. (RETURN TO SENDER; NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSES; UNABLE TO FORWARD). (Return to Sender; Not in Jail). No forwarding address listed with the FDOC, and OKALOOSA COUNTY JAIL did not list any forwarding addresses. (mb) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER. The clerk shall send Plaintiff the complete set of forms needed to file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (for prisoners). Within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall either file a complete motion to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $402.00 filing fee. (IFP Motion or Filing Fee due by 1/27/2023.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 1/6/2023. (mb)
|
| Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se Litigant, RODNEY DEWAYNE JOHNSON. (mb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against A SCOTT, filed by RODNEY DEWAYNE JOHNSON. (No service copies/no IFP Motion/Fee not paid). (mb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint. (No service copies/no IFP Motion/Fee not paid). Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (mb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: JOHNSON v. SCOTT | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: RODNEY DEWAYNE JOHNSON | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: A SCOTT | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
