POPE v. 3M COMPANY
DARREN POPE |
3M COMPANY |
3:2023cv02601 |
February 1, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
HOPE T CANNON |
M CASEY RODGERS |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (LIZIK, DANA) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 3M COMPANY ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLNDC-7671754.), filed by DARREN POPE. (LIZIK, DANA) |
JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS and MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON added. (djb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: POPE v. 3M COMPANY | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: DARREN POPE | |
Represented By: | DANA A LIZIK |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: 3M COMPANY | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.