LANG v. 3M COMPANY et al
ROBERT STEPHEN LANG |
3M COMPANY and 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC |
3:2023cv03539 |
February 8, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
HOPE T CANNON |
M CASEY RODGERS |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #3 First MOTION for Leave to File #2 Amended Complaint (no response) (djb) |
Motions No Longer Referred: #3 First MOTION for Leave to File re #2 Amended Complaint (djb) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #3 First MOTION for Leave to File re #2 Amended Complaint. (alb) |
Set Deadlines as to #3 First MOTION for Leave to File re #2 Amended Complaint . (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 3/10/2023). (djb) |
Filing 3 First MOTION for Leave to File re #2 Amended Complaint by ROBERT STEPHEN LANG. (WEBSTER, JASON) |
Filing 2 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against 3M COMPANY, filed by ROBERT STEPHEN LANG. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Dismiss 3MOS) (WEBSTER, JASON) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ORIGINAL against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLNDC-7687483.), filed by ROBERT STEPHEN LANG. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet LANG) (WEBSTER, JASON) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.