GARDNER v. SANDESTIN BEACH HOTEL LTD
| CHRISTIE GARDNER, DELAYNA CHILDERS, ELIZABETH RUGER, ROBERT JUDSON and RYLEE WOLFROM |
| SANDESTIN BEACH HOTEL LTD and SANDESTIN BEACH HOTEL LTD D/B/A SANDESTIN GOLF & BEACH RESORT |
| 3:2023cv05122 |
| March 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| HOPE T CANNON |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER. The Court finds, and the parties agree, that the interests of efficiency and judicial economy are best served by staying this matter, including all discovery and proceedings, for the reasons set forth in the parties' joint motion. This case is therefore STAYED until July 7, 2023. The parties must promptly notify the Court if the case settles or is ready to proceed. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 04/17/2023.( Deadline for clerk to check status of stay by 7/7/2023.) (alb)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #12 Joint MOTION to Stay Proceedings Pending Mediation (jcw) |
| Filing 12 Joint MOTION to Stay Proceedings Pending Mediation by SANDESTIN BEACH HOTEL LTD. (ANDERSON, MICHELLE) |
|
Filing 11
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set for 4/20/2023. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 5/22/2023. Discovery due by 10/2/2023. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 04/06/23. (jfj)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER re #9 MOTION TO EXTEND TIME WITHIN WHICH DEFENDANT MAY SERVE ITS RESPONSIVE PLEADING filed by SANDESTIN BEACH HOTEL LTD. The motion is GRANTED. The Defendant's deadline to respond to the Complaint is extended to April 18, 2023. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 04/05/23. (SANDESTIN BEACH HOTEL LTD answer due 4/18/2023.) (jfj)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint - Unopposed (jfj) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint, #8 Notice of Appearance. (Please see proposed ISO.) (jfj) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint - Unopposed by SANDESTIN BEACH HOTEL LTD. (ANDERSON, MICHELLE) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by MICHELLE ILENE ANDERSON on behalf of SANDESTIN BEACH HOTEL LTD (ANDERSON, MICHELLE) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF FILING AMENDED NOTICE OF FILING RETURN OF SERVICE by CHRISTIE GARDNER re #6 Notice (Other) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Return of Service) (CULLITON, SEAN) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF FILIING RETURN OF SERVICE by CHRISTIE GARDNER (Attachments: #1 Exhibit RETURN OF SERVICE) (CULLITON, SEAN) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF FILING CONSENT TO JOIN CASE AS OPT-IN PLAINTIFFS by CHRISTIE GARDNER (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Opt-In Childers, #2 Exhibit Opt-In Ruger, #3 Exhibit Opt-In Judson, #4 Exhibit Opt-In Wolfrom) (CULLITON, SEAN) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to SANDESTIN BEACH HOTEL LTD. (jfj) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE SUMMONS by Christie Gardner (CULLITON, SEAN) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (CULLITON, SEAN) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT CHRISTIE GARDNER against SANDESTIN BEACH HOTEL LTD ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLNDC-7746988.), filed by Christie Gardner. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Opt-In Form) (CULLITON, SEAN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
