BOWENS v. DUNS
| DUNS |
| E-YAGE BOWENS |
| 3:2023cv07353 |
| March 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| HOPE T CANNON |
| LACEY A COLLIER |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER re #9 Constitutional Due Process Inquiry. The relief requested is DENIED. The case was dismissed on 28 April (doc #7 ). Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 05/08/2023. (alb)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER notified that action is needed Re: #9 Constitutional Due Process Inquiry. (alb) |
| Filing 9 Constitutional Due Process Inquiry, by E-YAGE BOWENS. (alb) |
| Filing 8 CLERK'S JUDGMENT re #7 Order Adopting Report and Recommendation. Pursuant to and at the direction of the Court, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE under Rules Governing 2254 Cases, Rule 4. (jfj) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. #3 ) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. The Petition (ECF Doc. #1 ) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE under Rules Governing 2254 Cases, Rule 4. The clerk shall close the file. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 04/28/23. (jfj)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER notified that action is needed Re: #3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, #6 Objection to Report and Recommendations. (jfj) |
| Filing 5 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 300000106. Fee status updated to paid. (jfj) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER notified that action is needed Re: 5 Filing Fee Received. (jfj) |
| Filing 6 OBJECTION to #3 Report and Recommendations by E-YAGE BOWENS. (jfj) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Pending Payment of Filing Fee, by E-YAGE BOWENS. (alb) |
| Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The petition, ECF Doc. #1 , be DISMISSED. All pending motions be terminated. R&R flag set. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 4/5/2023. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 5/3/2023. (mb) |
| Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se Litigant. (alb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (alb) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by E-YAGE BOWENS. (1 service copy, no IFP motion or fee.) (alb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: BOWENS v. DUNS | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: E-YAGE BOWENS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DUNS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
