KIRK et al v. BIGAIRBAG B.V
| Robert Kirk, Isabella Kirk and I.K., A MINOR |
| BIGAIRBAG B.V and BIGAIRBAG BV |
| 3:2023cv08937 |
| April 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| HOPE T CANNON |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint by BIGAIRBAG BV. (DAHDAH, EVAN) |
Filing 12
FINAL SCHEDULING ORDER AND MEDIATION REFERRAL Re: #9 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting : Discovery due by 5/31/2024. Dispositive Motions to be filed by 6/30/2024. Mediation to take place by 6/28/2024. Mediation Report due by 7/12/2024. ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 06/16/2023. (alb) Modified on 6/21/2023 to correct dates (alb).
|
| Filing 11 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT by I.K., A MINOR, ROBERT KIRK. (HANCOCK, BRIAN) Modified on 6/12/2023 to match title of document (alb). |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Gregory T. Stevens of Phelps Dunbar LLP, is admitted pro hac vice to represent Defendant BIGAIRBAG B.V., pursuant to Local Rule 11.1(C). Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 06/06/2023. (Appointed GREGORY THOMAS STEVENS for BIGAIRBAG BV) (alb)
|
| Filing 9 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (HANCOCK, BRIAN) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #8 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Gregory T. Stevens.( Filing fee $ 208 receipt number AFLNDC-7897462.) (alb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #9 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (alb) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Gregory T. Stevens.( Filing fee $ 208 receipt number AFLNDC-7897462.) by BIGAIRBAG BV. (DAHDAH, EVAN) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by BIGAIRBAG BV. (DAHDAH, EVAN) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement/Certificate of Interested Persons by BIGAIRBAG BV identifying Corporate Parent HaTo World B.V., Other Affiliate Huting Company B.V., Other Affiliate JFS B.V for BIGAIRBAG BV.. (DAHDAH, EVAN) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer. ( Answer due by 5/24/2023.) Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 05/03/2023. (alb)
|
|
Filing 4
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set for 5/16/2023. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 6/15/2023. Discovery due by 10/24/2023. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 5/2/2023. (mb)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (Unopposed) (please see proposed ISO). (mb) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (Unopposed) by BIGAIRBAG BV. (DAHDAH, EVAN) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by BRIAN DOUGLAS HANCOCK on behalf of All Plaintiffs (HANCOCK, BRIAN) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #1 Notice of Removal (please see proposed ISO). (mb) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by BIGAIRBAG B.V from Escambia County, Florida, case number 2023-CA-000630. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLNDC-7842801.), filed by BIGAIRBAG B.V. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D) (DAHDAH, EVAN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
