WOOD et al v. MAYORKAS et al
Davis Stodard Wood and Inna Belousova |
Secretary ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Secretary ANTONY J BLINKEN, ConsulGeneral Mark Brzezinski, U.S Embassy, Warsaw, Poland, CONSUL GENERAL MARK BRZEZINSKI and US EMBASSY WARSAW POLAND |
3:2023cv10116 |
May 12, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
ZACHARY C BOLITHO |
M CASEY RODGERS |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to ANTONY J BLINKEN, Mark Brzezinski, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, U.S Embassy, Warsaw, Poland. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons) (jfj) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #1 COMPLAINT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS ARISING FROM DEFENDANTS' REFUSAL TO ADJUDICATE PLAINTIFF'S NONIMMIGRANT VISA APPLICATION. (jfj) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLNDC-7867525.), filed by Davis Stodard Wood, Inna Belousova. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Blinken, #3 Summons Brzezinski, #4 Summons Consulate in Poland, #5 Summons Garland, #6 Summons Mayorkas, #7 Summons U.S Attorney, #8 Exhibit A, #9 Exhibit B, #10 Exhibit C, #11 Exhibit D) (BURGOS, ALICE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.