FORD v. PROGRESSIVE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
AUSTIN FORD |
PROGRESSIVE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS |
3:2023cv12609 |
June 2, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
HOPE T CANNON |
T KENT WETHERELL |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER denying #6 Motion for entry of clerk's default. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 07/25/2023. (alb) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #6 Motion for Default Judgment. Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (alb) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Default, by AUSTIN FORD. (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 8/3/2023). (alb) |
Filing 5 ORDER, re #4 Summons Returned Executed. Plaintiff shall serve the Defendant in compliance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by August 31, 2023, and provide evidence of same to the Court. Plaintiff's failure to properly serve the Defendant by August 31, 2023, may result in recommendation that this case be dismissed. (Deadline to provide evidence of service of summons 8/31/2023.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 07/17/2023. (alb) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #4 Summons Returned Executed. (alb) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by AUSTIN FORD. PROGRESSIVE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS served on 6/23/2023, answer due 7/14/2023. (alb) |
Filing 3 ORDER, re #1 Complaint. Plaintiff is responsible for prompt service of the summons and complaint on the Defendant in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The service copy of the complaint must be identical to the complaint filed with the Court. Any paper submitted for filing that does not contain a certificate of service shall be returned by the clerk and disregarded by the Court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5; N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 5.1(F). Failure to timely serve the Defendant as set forth in Rule 4 may result in the dismissal of this action. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 06/06/2023. ( Status of Service 7/21/2023.) (alb) |
Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se Litigant. (alb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PROGRESSIVE MANAGEMENT SYSTMEMS (Filing fee paid $402, rec # 300000212.), filed by AUSTIN FORD. (No service copies.) (alb) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/2/2023: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (alb). |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint. (alb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: FORD v. PROGRESSIVE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: AUSTIN FORD | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: PROGRESSIVE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.