JACKSON v. 3M COMPANY
WILLIAM JACKSON IV and WILLIAM JACKSON, IV |
3M COMPANY |
3:2023cv13478 |
June 9, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
HOPE T CANNON |
M CASEY RODGERS |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER. The law firms representing these plaintiffs are directed to confer with one another and move to dismiss the case that is deemed to be the duplicate case within 7 days of the date of this Order. To the extent the law firms fail to dismiss the duplicate case by the deadline, the Court will dismiss the duplicate case.. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 8/4/2023. (erl) |
Filing 4 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: Notice to Filer - When entering party names during case opening please use the "Generation" field to enter JR, SR, II, III, etc, and without punctuation unless its part of the name. Do not add generation to last name. Clerk will correct party name. (djb) |
Filing 3 NOTICE Notice of Designated Forum - United States District Court, District of Delaware by WILLIAM JACKSON IV re #1 Complaint (KUYKENDALL, FREDERICK) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (KUYKENDALL, FREDERICK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against 3M COMPANY ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLNDC-7912839.), filed by WILLIAM JACKSON IV. (KUYKENDALL, FREDERICK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.