DAVIS v. UNIVERSAL TINT PROS, LLC et al
Plaintiff: BRANDON DAVIS
Defendant: UNIVERSAL TINT PROS, LLC doing business as UNIVERSAL TINT PROS OF PENSACOLA and DAVID KLIMEK
Case Number: 3:2023cv14399
Filed: June 15, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: ZACHARY C BOLITHO
Referring Judge: T KENT WETHERELL
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 8, 2023 Filing 9 NOTICE of SERVICE by BRANDON DAVIS (TALBOTT, JEREMIAH)
July 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 FINAL SCHEDULING ORDER Re: #7 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting : Discovery due by 2/29/2024. Dispositive Motions to be filed by 3/28/2024. Mediation to take place by 3/14/2024. Mediation Report due by 3/21/2024. Signed by JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II on 07/28/2023. (alb)
July 27, 2023 Filing 7 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (CONNORS, CLAYTON)
June 22, 2023 Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by DAVID KLIMEK, UNIVERSAL TINT PROS, LLC. (CONNORS, CLAYTON)
June 21, 2023 Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement/Certificate of Interested Persons by DAVID KLIMEK, UNIVERSAL TINT PROS, LLC. (CONNORS, CLAYTON)
June 21, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by CLAYTON MORRIS CONNORS on behalf of All Defendants (CONNORS, CLAYTON)
June 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER : Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set for 6/30/2023. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 7/31/2023. Discovery due by 10/16/2023. Signed by JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II on 06/16/2023. (alb)
June 16, 2023 ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II notified that action is needed Re: #1 Notice of Removal. (Please see proposed ISO.) (alb)
June 15, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (CONNORS, CLAYTON)
June 15, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by DAVID KLIMEK, UNIVERSAL TINT PROS, LLC from CIRCUIT COURT OF FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLROIDA, case number 2023 cc 000684. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLNDC-7922299.), filed by DAVID KLIMEK, UNIVERSAL TINT PROS, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "A" Complaint and Summons) (CONNORS, CLAYTON)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DAVIS v. UNIVERSAL TINT PROS, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BRANDON DAVIS
Represented By: JEREMIAH JOSEPH TALBOTT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNIVERSAL TINT PROS, LLC doing business as UNIVERSAL TINT PROS OF PENSACOLA
Represented By: CLAYTON MORRIS CONNORS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DAVID KLIMEK
Represented By: CLAYTON MORRIS CONNORS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?