BURKE et al v. UNTIED STATES
| DARLA BURKE, KEVIN BURKE, JACOB BURKE and ELIZABETH BURKE-O'BEIRNE |
| UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, NAVAL CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES and UNITED STATES |
| 3:2023cv16728 |
| June 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Pensacola Office |
| ZACHARY C BOLITHO |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER. The Clerk is directed to designate the motion, ECF No. #10 , as pending on the Court's docket and refer it to chambers together with the response, ECF No. #15 , and the reply, ECF No. #16 , which the Court will consider and rule on in due course. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 6/29/2023. (mb)
|
|
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #16 Reply to #15 Response to #10 MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Transfer Venue. (mb)
|
|
Filing 18
Case electronically transferred in from District of Texas Northern; Case Number 4:23-cv-00259. Original file with documents number 1 - 17 received.
|
|
Filing 17
Opinion and Order: Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss or, in the alternative, to Transfer Venue to the Pensacola Division of the Northern District of Florida. ECF. No. #10 . Defendant's alternative Motion to Transfer is GRANTED IN PART. This case is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Pensacola Division of the Northern District of Florida. (See order for specifics) (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 6/28/2023) (fba) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 6/28/2023.]
|
|
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #17 Opinion and Order: Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss or, in the alternative, to Transfer Venue to the Pensacola Division of the Northern District of Florida. ECF. No. #10 . Defendant's alternative Motion to Transfer is GRANTED IN PART. (mb)
|
|
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #10 MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Transfer Venue. (please see proposed ISO). (mb)
|
|
Filing 16
REPLY filed by United States re: #10 MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Transfer Venue (Delaney-DOJ, Sarah) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 6/28/2023.]
|
|
Filing 15
RESPONSE filed by Darla Burke, Jacob Burke, Kevin Burke, Elizabeth Burke-O'Beirne re: #10 MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Transfer Venue (Brennan, Ross) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 6/28/2023.]
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER...Before the Court is Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion to Substitute United States as the Sole Defendant. ECF No. #13 . Having considered the motion, and noting that it is unopposed, the Court GRANTS the motion. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Transfer Venue (ECF No. #10 ), to the extent it seeks dismissal based on incorrect identification of Defendant, is hereby DENIED as moot. United States added. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 5/26/2023) (wxc) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 6/28/2023.]
|
|
Filing 13
MOTION to Substitute Party filed by Darla Burke, Jacob Burke, Kevin Burke, Elizabeth Burke-O'Beirne with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Brennan, Ross) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 6/28/2023.]
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER: Before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative to Transfer Venue ("Motion"). ECF No. #10 . Having reviewed the Motion, the Court concludes that it would benefit from an expedited response from Plaintiff. The Court has serious questions as to whether this action is better suited in the Northern District of Florida. The Court therefore ORDERS Plaintiff to file a response to Defendant's Motion (ECF No. #10 ) on or before June 6, 2023. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 5/23/2023) (sre) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 6/28/2023.]
|
|
Filing 11
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by United States Department of the Navy. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Delaney-DOJ, Sarah) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 6/28/2023.]
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Transfer Venue filed by United States Department of the Navy with Brief/Memorandum in Support. Attorney Sarah Elizabeth Delaney-DOJ added to party United States Department of the Navy(pty:dft) (Delaney-DOJ, Sarah) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 6/28/2023.]
|
|
Filing 9
SUMMONS Returned Executed as to United States Department of the Navy ; served on 4/24/2023. (Brennan, Ross) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 6/28/2023.]
|
|
Filing 8
SUMMONS Returned Executed as to United States Department of the Navy ; served on 3/22/2023. (Brennan, Ross) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 6/28/2023.]
|
|
Filing 7
SUMMONS Returned Executed as to United States Department of the Navy ; served on 3/20/2023. (Brennan, Ross) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 6/28/2023.]
|
|
Filing 6
Summons issued as to United States Department of the Navy, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General per #4 . (sre) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 6/28/2023.]
|
|
Filing 5
New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Pittman. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (sre) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 6/28/2023.]
|
|
Filing 4
Request for Clerk to issue summons (combined) filed by Darla Burke, Jacob Burke, Kevin Burke, Elizabeth Burke-O'Beirne. (Brennan, Ross) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 6/28/2023.]
|
|
Filing 3
ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to #1 Complaint, by Plaintiffs Darla Burke, Jacob Burke, Kevin Burke, Elizabeth Burke-O'Beirne. (Brennan, Ross) Modified on 3/15/2023 (sre). [Transferred from Texas Northern on 6/28/2023.]
|
|
Filing 2
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Darla Burke, Jacob Burke, Kevin Burke, Elizabeth Burke-O'Beirne. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Brennan, Ross) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 6/28/2023.]
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against United States Department of the Navy and Naval Criminal Investigative Services of filed by Kevin Burke, Darla Burke, Jacob Burke, Elizabeth Burke-O'Beirne. (ATXNDC-13591009, $402.00) Plaintiff will submit summons(es) for issuance. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 FTCA denial) (Brennan, Ross) Modified on 3/15/2023 (sre). Modified on 3/15/2023 (sre). [Transferred from Texas Northern on 6/28/2023.]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
