BROOKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
| JOHN BROOKS |
| 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO LLC and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC |
| 3:2023cv17363 |
| July 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| HOPE T CANNON |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE by JOHN BROOKS. (FARIES, STEVE) |
Filing 2
ORDER - Despite the Court's warnings, the 139 plaintiffs identified on Exhibit A have more than one case filed on the active docket. The law firms representing these plaintiffs are directed to confer with one another and move to dismiss the case that is deemed to be the duplicate case within 14 days of the date of this Order. To the extent the law firms fail to dismiss the duplicate case by the deadline, the Court will dismiss the later filed case. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 7/27/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Deadline Set for 8/10/2023.) (djb)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND JURY TRIAL DEMAND against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLNDC-7953881.), filed by JOHN BROOKS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (FARIES, STEVE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
