PIERRE v. SMITH et al
Plaintiff: MARCAUREL A PIERRE
Defendant: J K SMITH, IGO and J KOLODZEIJ
Case Number: 3:2023cv24722
Filed: November 22, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: ZACHARY C BOLITHO
Referring Judge: M CASEY RODGERS
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 10, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. On or before January 24, 2024, Plaintiff must show cause, if any, why this case should not be dismissed for failure to comply with an order of the Court. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation of dismissal of this case. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO on 01/10/24. (Show Cause Response due by 1/24/2024.) (jfj)
January 9, 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: #3 Order. Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, Filing Fee, or IFP motion due by 1/2/2024. (Notice, Fee, IFP motion not filed) (jfj)
November 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Plaintiff a form application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis with this case number included on the form. Within thirty days of the date of this order, Plaintiff must: file a notice of voluntary dismissal; OR submit payment in the amount of $402.00; OR file a complete application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on the Court-approved form. Plaintiff's failure to comply with an order of the Court will result in a recommendation of dismissal of this case. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO on 11/30/23. (Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, Filing Fee, or IFP motion due by 1/2/2024.) (Form sent as directed.) (jfj)
November 27, 2023 Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se Litigant. (jfj)
November 27, 2023 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint. (jfj)
November 22, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by MARCAUREL A PIERRE. (No service copies, fee, or IFP motion received.) (jfj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PIERRE v. SMITH et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MARCAUREL A PIERRE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J K SMITH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: IGO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J KOLODZEIJ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?