WASHINGTON v. JONES et al
MARLO WASHINGTON |
G JONES, HERNANDEZ and SABRINA POTTER |
3:2023cv24756 |
December 18, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
HOPE T CANNON |
LACEY A COLLIER |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 CLERK'S JUDGMENT re #9 Order Adopting Report and Recommendation. Pursuant to and at the direction of the Court, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because Plaintiff is a three-striker who failed to pay the $402.00 filing fee, as well as for being malicious based upon Plaintiffs failure to truthfully disclose his litigation history. (jfj) |
Filing 9 ORDER. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. #3 ) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because Plaintiff is a three-striker who failed to pay the $402.00 filing fee, as well as for being malicious based upon Plaintiff's failure to truthfully disclose his litigation history. The clerk shall close the file. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 02/12/24. (jfj) |
Filing 8 OBJECTION to #3 Report and Recommendations by MARLO WASHINGTON. (jfj) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER notified that action is needed Re: #3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, #8 Objection to Report and Recommendations. (jfj) |
Filing 7 ORDER re #6 Motion for Extension of Time. The requested relief is GRANTED in part. Objections now due not later than 5 February 2024. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 01/17/24. (Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 2/5/2024.). (jfj) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time by MARLO WASHINGTON. (jfj) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER notified that action is needed Re: #6 MOTION for Extension of Time. (Please see proposed R&O.) (jfj) |
Filing 5 ORDER re #4 Motion for Extension of Time filed by MARLO WASHINGTON. The requested relief is GRANTED. Objections now due not later than 26 January 2024. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 01/10/24. (Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 1/26/2024.) (jfj) |
Filing 4 MOTION for an Extension of Time by MARLO WASHINGTON. (jfj) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER notified that action is needed Re: #4 MOTION for an Extension of Time by MARLO WASHINGTON. (Please see proposed R&O.) (jfj) |
Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint filed by MARLO WASHINGTON - It is RECOMMENDED: That this case be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because Plaintiff is a three- striker who failed to pay the $402.00 filing fee, as well as for being malicious based upon Plaintiff's failure to truthfully disclose his litigation history. That the clerk be directed to close the file. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 12/26/23. R&R flag set (Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 1/23/2024.) (jfj) |
Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se Litigant. (jfj) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint. (jfj) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by MARLO WASHINGTON. (No service copies, IFP motion, or fee received.) (jfj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.