HEARD v. DIXON et al
| DOYLE L HEARD |
| RICKY DIXON and ASHLEY B MOODY |
| 3:2024cv00002 |
| January 3, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MARTIN A FITZPATRICK |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed Re: #12 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed-RICKY DIXON. (rcb) |
| Filing 12 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed-RICKY DIXON filed by DOYLE L HEARD. (rcb) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by DAMARIS E REYNOLDS on behalf of RICKY DIXON, ASHLEY B MOODY (REYNOLDS, DAMARIS) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed Re: #10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed -Attorney General. (rcb) |
| Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed -Attorney General filed by DOYLE L HEARD. (rcb) |
| Filing 9 Letter from USDC MIDDLE DISTRICT WITH SUPPLEMENT ATTACHED-WITH USDC MIDDLE DISTRICT CASE STYLE. (rcb) |
Filing 8
ORDER DIRECTING RESPONSE TO #7 AMENDED 2254 PETITION . The Clerk shall serve copies of the amended 2254 petition (ECF No. #7 ) and this order on Respondent and the Attorney General of the State of Florida. Respondent shall file an answer, motion, or other response to the petition on or before 4/17/2024. Petitioner shall file a reply, if any, no later than 5/17/2024. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK on 1/17/2024. (rcb)**ECF #7 & #8 FORWARDED AS DIRECTED**
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed Re: #9 Letter from USDC MIDDLE DISTRICT WITH SUPPLEMENT ATTACHED-USDC CASE STYLE. (rcb) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by DOYLE L HEARD. (rcb)**NO SERVICE COPY RECEIVED** |
| Filing 6 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 300000697. Fee status updated to paid. (jfj) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed Re: 6 Filing Fee Received. (jfj) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed Re: #7 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (rcb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed Re: #5 SUPPLEMENT. (rcb) |
| Filing 5 SUPPLEMENT by DOYLE L HEARD (rcb) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER - The Clerk of Court shall forward to Petitioner an application for leave to proceed IFP. The Clerk shall forward four 2254 forms to Petitioner, writing "AMENDED" and the case number on the blank forms. Amended Pleadings due by 2/5/2024. Motions due by 2/5/2024. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK on 1/4/24. (sjb)(Clerk provided forms)
|
| Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se Litigant. (alb) |
| Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by DOYLE L HEARD. (No service copies, no IFP motion or fee received.) (alb) |
| Filing 1 USCA Order transferring case to the Northern District of Florida. (Attachments: #1 USCA COVER LETTER) (alb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed Re: #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (alb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
