DUBOSE v. AUGHTMAN
| Karen Aughtman Dubose |
| Brenda B Aughtman |
| 3:2024cv00045 |
| February 2, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| ZACHARY C BOLITHO |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER re #8 JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME. The motion is GRANTED. Defendant's deadline to respond to the Complaint is extended to April 5, 2024. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 03/13/24. (BRENDA B AUGHTMAN Answer due by 4/5/2024.) (jfj)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #8 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Until After Mediation (mb) |
| Filing 8 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Until After Mediation by BRENDA B AUGHTMAN. (WELTON, MARK) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER re #6 Stipulated MOTION TO EXTEND TIME. The motion is DENIED with prejudice. Defendant may refile a motion to extend time which provides the Court with the scheduled mediation date. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 02/29/24. (jfj)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer until after mediation (Unopposed). (mb) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer until after mediation by BRENDA B AUGHTMAN. (WELTON, MARK) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint; Notice of Lis Pendens served on Brenda B. Aughtman on 02/16/2024, filed by KAREN AUGHTMAN DUBOSE. (ADAMS, JOHN) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to BRENDA B AUGHTMAN. (mb) |
| Filing 3 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: The parties in the above-referenced case were added to the docket incorrectly and will be corrected by the clerk. Party names are to be entered in all caps and without punctuation. For future reference: Please review the procedure for adding/creating new parties in the "Style Guide for Electronic Case Filing" and/or chapter 10 of the "CM/ECF Attorney User's Guide," available at www.flnd.uscourts.gov. (mb) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Lis Pendens by Karen Aughtman Dubose (ADAMS, JOHN) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Brenda B Aughtman ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AFLNDC-8573160.), filed by Karen Aughtman Dubose. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (ADAMS, JOHN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: DUBOSE v. AUGHTMAN | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Karen Aughtman Dubose | |
| Represented By: | JOHN HARDY ADAMS |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Brenda B Aughtman | |
| Represented By: | MARK H WELTON |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
