MATHEWS v. HUGE et al
CARLTON XAVIER MATHEWS |
HUGE, LUSK and J M LAMBERT |
3:2024cv00109 |
March 11, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
HOPE T CANNON |
M CASEY RODGERS |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint. (No objections filed.) (alb) |
Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint, Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED: That this case be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). That the clerk close the file. (Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 4/17/2024.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 3/20/2024. (jcw) |
Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se Litigant. (alb) |
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint, #2 Prisoner Consent Form & Financial Certificate. (alb) |
Filing 2 PRISONER CONSENT & FINANCIAL CERTIFICATE by CARLTON XAVIER MATHEWS. (alb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against HUGE, J M LAMBERT, LUSK, filed by CARLTON XAVIER MATHEWS. (No service copies.) (Attachments: #1 Letter and Notice of Imminent Danger) (alb) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/19/2024: #1 Main Document) (jcw). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.