ALLEN v. ROTTER et al
| SHER'MON ALLEN |
| MACKUS, ROTTER and SAUSBERRY |
| 3:2024cv00307 |
| July 5, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| ZACHARY C BOLITHO |
| LACEY A COLLIER |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #7 ) is GRANTED to the extent the case may proceed without prepayment of the entire filing fee. Because Plaintiff has no funds accrued in his inmate trust fund account, the Court will not assess Plaintiff an initial partial filing fee as provided in 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1)(A). However, the total filing fee in this case remains $350.00. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order, with the appropriate cover letter to the Florida Department of Corrections, 501 South Calhoun St., Tallahassee, FL 32399-2500, Attention: Agency Clerk. (Order and letter mailed to DOC.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO on 08/30/2024. (alb)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by SHER'MON ALLEN. (alb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: #7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to ZACHARY C BOLITHO. (alb) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER denying without prejudice, #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Plaintiff a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a Prisoner Consent Form and Financial Certificate approved for use in the Northern District. This case number should be written on the forms. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to pay the filing fee or file a new IFP motion is GRANTED. (Doc. #5 ). Within thirty days of the date of docketing of this order Plaintiff must either (1) pay the $405.00 filing fee, or (2) file a completed motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Order and form mailed.) (Fee or form due by 9/12/2024.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO on 08/13/2024. (alb)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: #5 MOTION to Extend Time, #4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to ZACHARY C BOLITHO. (alb) |
| Filing 5 Motion Requesting for Extension of Time if Needed, by SHER'MON ALLEN. (alb) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by SHER'MON ALLEN. (alb) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Plaintiff the Court forms for seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk must include this case number on the forms. Within thirty days of the date of this order, Plaintiff must either submit payment in the amount of $405.00 or file a complete motion to proceed in forma pauperis on the Court form. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO on 07/15/2024.( Fee or form due by 8/14/2024.) (Order and form mailed.) (alb)
|
| Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se Litigant. (alb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MACKUS, ROTTER, SAUSBERRY, filed by SHER'MON ALLEN. (No service copies, no IFP motion or fee received.) (alb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint. (alb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
