GODMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
| TAMMY BELINDA GODMAN |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 3:2024cv00346 |
| July 25, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| HOPE T CANNON |
| T KENT WETHERELL |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. It is RECOMMENDED: That this case be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE due to Godman's failure to prosecute and failure to comply with Court orders. That the clerk close the file. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 09/11/24. R&R flag set. (Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 10/9/2024.) (jfj)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Plaintiff shall have fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order to show cause why this case should not be dismissed due to her failure to comply with the Court's July 25 Order. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this Order will result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed without further notice. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 08/22/24. (Show Cause Response due by 9/5/2024.) (jfj)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER. The clerk is directed to close this miscellaneous case, assign a civil case number to Godman's filings, and docket a copy of this Order in the newly-opened civil case. The clerk shall send Godman a civil complaint form and the set of forms needed to file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (for non- prisoners). The civil case number assigned to Godman's filings should be written on the forms. Godman shall have twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Order: (1) pay the remaining balance of the $405 filing fee ($353) or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis; and (2) file a complaint which complies with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 and establishes the jurisdiction of this Court to hear her claims. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 07/25/2024. ( Amended Pleadings due by 8/15/2024. Fee or form due by 8/15/2024.) (Forms mailed with new case number.) (alb)
|
| Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se Litigant. (alb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint. (alb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, filed by TAMMY BELINDA GODMAN. (No service copies. Partial filing fee received $52.00, receipt # 300001068.) (Attachments: #1 Praecipe to the Clerk, #2 Exhibit.) (alb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: GODMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: TAMMY BELINDA GODMAN | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
